The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Media
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Why Playing Games Counts as Smart

11/10/2019

 
By John Considine
Picture
“We begin from the observation that games are not easy to play, or at least not play well”.  From this sentence onwards, I was receptive to the arguments made by Mark Walker and John Wooders in their American Economic Review paper about the strategies used by tennis players.  My memory is not what it used to be, however, I can still remember the difficulty in playing games.  When we lose those memories we more easily criticise current players for not being able to do things that we did with great difficulty (or could not do at all).  Reading that sentence by Walker and Wooders put me in a good mood.  The good mood helped sustain my reading effort.
 
Giving the writer a fair hearing is always a good idea.  However, I probably restrained my critical faculties too much on my first reading of a 2018 paper by Scott Kretchmar (published in Quest).  The subtitle of the paper caught my attention – “Why Playing Games Counts as Smart” – but it was the presentation of the argument that I most enjoyed.  Kretchmar says that when he was younger he somewhat bought into the “unintelligent jock” argument.  He does not launch a full frontal assault on this view.  He just has a bit of fun with it.  In the course of the paper he says “if game intellection led the way into culture – how deliciously ironic that would be”.  He presents his argument but does not seek to beat the reader over the head with it.
 
Kretchmar says that science, art, and sport are human actions based on expertise.  He goes on to argue that a commitment to expertise is a commitment to excellence.  Walker and Wooders come at the same idea but from a difference angle.  They use data from professional sports because “the participants have devoted their lives to becoming experts at their games”.  Their results lends support to the argument that expert jocks adopt the strategies that the theorists recommend.  The players play minimax at Wimbleton.
 
Similar findings are presented by Ignacio Palacios-Huerta in his book Beautiful Game Theory.  Here we find soccer players rather than tennis players.  In the first chapter Palacios-Huerta examines the behaviour of participants in penalty kicks.  The expert jocks perform as the theorists recommend.  The first chapter is called “Pele meets John von Neumann in the Penalty Area”.
 
The second chapter is called “Vernon Smith meets Messi in the Laboratory”.  Here our expert jocks are taken from the field of play.  They are taken from their highly pressurised comfort zone and placed in the somewhat artificial environment of a laboratory.  Here they play non-physical games with similar characteristics.  Again, the expert jocks come up trumps.  They demonstrate something like transferable skills and more abstract reasoning skills.  Or maybe we are witnessing the commitment to excellence that Kretchmar describes.

Vernon Smith shared the 2002 Nobel Prize in Economics.  His work in experimental economics explains the title of Chapter 2 from Beautiful Game Theory.  In recent years, he has advocated that economics needs to reconsider the great works of his 18th century namesake (Adam Smith), e.g. Humanomics: Moral Sentiments and the Wealth of Nations for the twenty-first century (2019).  In that spirit it is worth quoting from The Wealth of Nations (1776).

“The difference between the most dissimilar characters, between a philosopher and a street porter, for example, seem to arise not so much from nature, as from habit, custom, and education.  When they come into the world … neither their parents nor play-fellow could perceive any remarkable difference … they come to be employed in very different occupations.  The difference of talent comes then to be taken notice of, and widens by degrees, till at last the vanity of the philosopher is willing to notice scarce any resemblance.”

Smith poked fun at the vanity of the intellectual over the physical.  Kretchmar does likewise.


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.