The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

The ruling on the field, technology, and error costs

13/12/2021

 
By John Considine
Picture
On Saturday the top three teams in the English Premier League were awarded penalties that were reviewed by the available technology (VAR).  All three of the top teams won their games by one goal.  These were important decisions.  As is normal, debates followed about the penalties that were awarded, the ones that might have been awarded, and the time taken by those using VAR to cast an opinion.
 
It is possible to combine these elements into a framework used by economists in competition law (antitrust).  The framework seeks to minimise the cost of errors.  The total cost of errors is (1) the error of awarding a penalty that should not have been awarded, (2) the error of not awarding a penalty that should have been awarded, and (3) the cost of decision-making system.
 
The introduction of VAR increased the decision-making costs and decreased, but not eliminated, type-1 and type-2 errors (also known as false positives and false negatives).  Given the importance of type-1 and type-2 errors then it is hard to argue for the removal of VAR.  Improvements in the use of VAR will reduce the costs of the third component.
 
The error cost framework also allows us to consider the presumptions behind the rules we use and how these presumptions shift the burden of proof.  In the case of penalties, the spur of the moment decision by the referee is presumed to be correct.  There must be a clear and obvious error for the decision of the referee to be overturned.  The presumption is closer to the presumption of innocence in criminal cases.  The burden of proof is higher than the balance of probabilities one might find in civil cases.
 
Time is important.  Compare the way decisions about penalties are made with the way decisions are made about offside.  In the latter case, the assistant referee is advised to delay any decision with an element of doubt.  The cost of type-1 and type-2 errors is likely to be smaller than in the case of penalty kicks but the system costs are higher due to number of such decisions.  Where a goal results then it is reviewable.  However, in the case of offside decisions, the technology, and those operating it, are judge & jury.  Again, it seems VAR reduces the error costs associated with the decisions.
 
It is important to note that the technology is not error free and its users are not without bias.  False positives will remain.  Rather than get into a discussion of false positives in the context of technology, let me recommend a visit to the website of the photographer Esther Hovers.  Or better still, a visit to the Data Streams exhibition at the Glucksmann, University College Cork.  The exhibition incorporates some of Hovers’ work.


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.