The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

​The Failed Box Office Experiment

10/11/2020

 
By David Butler

The Premier League recently announced that they, along with their partners Sky Sports and BT, will be "changing direction" and discontinuing their pay-per-view match offering. This is a second attempt of having multiple paywalls; Sky’s Prem Plus lasted from 2001-2007 and was based on a similar model. 

The recent extension was introduced a few months back so that matches typically played during at the 3pm Saturday time slot, and not shown live on TV, could be viewed by fans. Of course, this came at a price – every pay-per-view match cost £14.95 in the UK and €16.95 in Ireland. It wasn’t the case that Sky were charging extra per se, as these matches were in addition to the 140 live matches on the premium channel.

The logic proposed by the EPL seems to be that pay-per-view charges would allow fans of every club to watch their team during the pandemic and raise revenue for clubs in the absence of matchday fan income.

14 matches have been sold via PPV in the UK but now the PPV model is being abandoned. Some casual data tweeted by Joel Minsky suggests that several matches sold poorly. These figures were based on BARB viewing data -which is not the same as buyer data. Newcastle vs. Man Utd had 40 viewers, while Leicester vs. Aston Villa only had 20k. Liverpool vs. Sheffield United sold relatively well, coming in at 110k viewers. Arsenal vs. Leicester registered 140k. Given the size of the Newcastle and Manchester United fan bases, I was surprised by the buy rate – maybe this reflects fans disdain for PPV.

Back-of-the-envelope calculations say that these raised ~4.63m (assuming all viewers paid – which may not be true). This figure might seem reasonable but averaging it over 4 matches, this is lower than what Sky pay per match. However, I don’t know if (or what) Sky are paying for these extra matches. On top of this, there is likely lost advertising revenue from choosing the PPV route and, as can be seen from fans donating the PPV fee to charity, plenty of bad publicity.  

Given that Sky are happy to end the PPV model one would have to infer that it’s not making economic sense. That said, they may have been content with this failing from the start – for a company with savvy marketers, it seems strange that a Monday evening fixture between West Brom and Burnley would be packaged as “box office”....

If I recall correctly, there was plenty of disdain about the PremPlus model in the early 2000’s too. Back then however, there was no method to allow fans successfully coordinate on mass to donate the fee to charity like they have done this time.  

One final thought. Are Sky bailing out at the wrong time? Some of the earliest matches on box office were broadcast when fans could have partook in out-of-home viewing. England and Ireland are now back in lockdown, so the option of the pub is now out.


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.