The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Regulation in sport - yes for doping but not for concussion

19/8/2013

2 Comments

 
by Declan Jordan
Recently David Butler wrote about the economics of doping and referred to the freedom of choice as one of the arguments for allowing athletes use performance enhancing drugs (while presenting other arguments for and against). This means athletes should be allowed to weigh up the benefits and costs and make an informed decision. This would imply that sports bodies shouldn't regulate for performance enhancing drugs, allowing a 'free market' decide on the optimal level of drug use in sports. There are similar arguments used to oppose regulations in life outside of sport, in arguments on the use of graphic images on cigarette packages and the banning of large sugary drinks in New York.

These arguments for allowing athletes use performance enhancing drugs assume that they possess all of the knowledge to make an informed decision and that they possess sufficient power to resist doping where that is required by, for example a coach or the rest of their team. It is clear that sports bodies accept that regulation is necessary to protect athletes from undue pressure and/or from themselves. And yet in other situations these bodies seem very reluctant to regulate to protect players.
Picture
Recently we heard about the first case of early onset dementia caused by playing rugby. This coincided with the International Rugby Board's (IRB) decision to continue with its concussion protocol that allows players leave the field for 5 minutes to assess concussion and then to return if they pass by answering certain questions. Rory Lamont, a former Scottish international, has claimed that players can cheat that test and are under pressure to play through concussion injuries. Brian O'Driscoll has been equally praised and criticised for carrying on playing while suspected of concussion, most notably against France last season.One of those who criticised him was his uncle Dr Barry O'Driscoll (also a former Irish international). He has advocated for a stronger regulation of concussion in rugby. He suggests that:

the advice of the World Conference on Concussion in Sport, which has unanimously recommended that there should be no return to play on the same day of a suspected concussion, should be the template on which rugby bases its approach.

The same Conference also recommends that a graded seven-day assessment should be undertaken after a concussion.

There is an inconsistency in the stance of the IRB which implements an anti-doping policy while at the same time refusing to regulate to protect players from coaches that may wish to keep their best players on the pitch (their decision horizon is much more short-term than a player's may be) and also to protect players from themselves.

As the players, the hits and the prizes get bigger in this sport it is likely that a crisis point will come and regulation will be forced on the IRB. Of course this is not just a rugby issue but affects all athletes in contact sports. Davy Fitzgerald, the Clare hurling manager, showed how the pressure on coaches and back room staff can lead to bad and potentially dangerous decisions being made in relation to concussion when he called for an independent doctor to assess suspected concussion. The GAA recently published welcome guidelines on managing concussion. It says that a player with a suspected concussion injury should not return to current game or training. It will be interesting to see whether this will be the case and Davy Fitzgerald seems to indicate that players and managers can't be trusted to call it. This is hardly surprising in light of the recent survey by the Gaelic Players Association (GPA) that revealed that 58% of intercounty players admitted to playing on in a game while concussed.
Picture
There is a significant problem in sport where injuries to limbs, muscles and bones are given time to heal while brain injuries are not treated with the same gravity. This may be due to asymmetric information where athletes and coaches aren't aware of the implications and/or by asymmetry in the power structure between players and coaches/managers. Where these arise in an economic relationship there is often a response to regulate to protect the party with less information or less power. It is past time that appropriate regulation was introduced for concussion.

2 Comments
Gerry Moloney
19/8/2013 03:57:50 am

Great article Dec, I agree completely, the person deciding whether a player is concussed or not should have no connection or affiliation with either team or association.
It seems though that this is not going to happen in a hurry.
http://www.irishexaminer.com/sport/rugby/using-the-head-137010.html

As this article from 2010 will tell you.

Reply
Chris Byers link
3/12/2020 01:22:20 am

This is very true! Will consider this moving forward :)

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.