The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Referees Act Like Parents

9/9/2013

0 Comments

 
By John Considine
At the end of normal time in the All-Ireland hurling final it was announced that there would be at least two added minutes.  At the end of the two added minutes, with Cork leading by a point, the ball went out of play.  Cork fans wanted the referee to blow his whistle to signal the end.  However, he played another 30 second and Clare secured an equaliser.  The initial ire of the Cork fans subsided and most agreed it was a fair result.
 
The consensus seems to be that the referee did not have one of his better games.  Clare fans believe Shane O’Neill should have been sent off and that the referee gave some easy frees to Cork.  Cork fans believe that the Clare defence were too close to the ball on two Cork 20m frees.  They also believe that the referee gave Clare a chance to draw the game.  Crucially, neither set of supporters believe the referee was biased against their team.
 
One criticism of Brian Gavin is that he gave Clare a chance to equalise. This ignores the fact that referees tend to act like parents.  They tend to balance things out amongst their children by being flexible with the rules. They give everyone a fighting chance – especially those behind.  Using research on baseball, Tobias Moskowitz (Professor of Finance, University of Chicago) and Jon Wertheim (writer, Sports Illustrated), confirm that the behaviour of Brian Gavin conformed to officiating behaviour in other sports.  Moskowitz & Wertheim use millions of pitches in baseball to test their hypothesis.  These are pitches recorded on camera by MLB.  Table 1 presents their data.
Picture
On the first pitch the officials call between 83.4% and 98.9% correctly.  These are pitches that travel at speeds above 85mph.  On the first pitch the batter and the pitcher are tied 0-0.  At 0-0 the umpire call 84.9% of pitches in the strike zone correctly.  What is revealing about the data presented by Moskowitz & Wertheim is that the umpire tends to  favour the guy that is losing on subsequent pitches.  When the batter is behind 0-2, the umpire only calls 57.7% of balls that passed through the strike zone correctly.  The greater number of umpire “errors” favour the batter.  When the pitcher is behind 3-0 the umpire calls 93.1% correctly. The decrease in “errors” from the 84.9% (when the score was 0-0) to 93.1% favours the pitcher.

It is clear that parents and neutral fans are not the only ones that favour the underdog.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.