The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Potential Effects of Moving the Transfer Deadline Back

2/3/2018

 
​By David Butler

It was recently announced that transfer (registration) window will close for all English football league clubs on 9th August at 5.00pm. The window for EFL clubs is now synchronised with the Premier League, who have collectively chosen to close the window two days before the 18/19 season starts. This is well before the window shuts for the rest of Europe.

As the true valuation clubs place on players is often only revealed at the eleventh hour, supporters have become accustomed to seeing a deadline effect. Last minute deals are often cut as bargaining power shifts close to a deadline. A chain reaction usually occurs as one deal begets another; clubs won’t sell without a replacement. I would guess that this behaviour, and all the associated hype, will just be moved backward three weeks.

There might be some subtle and some unforeseen effects however. This could go two ways. Pushing the deadline back may make things more frantic, particularly during years where international competitions take place. In turn, this could increase the frequency of business in the January window. Oppositely, it may stop panic buys which can occur under the current rules. At the moment clubs can overpay after a bad start.

Moving the transfer window backward may alter the ‘deadline day’ activity in other ways too. The buying-selling dynamic of the window will likely change as clubs will still have plenty of time to offload players abroad.  Will we see more last minute splurges as clubs still have an extra few weeks to flog unwanted talent on the continent? Perhaps. Equally, it will present a challenge for elite clubs who have players in demand from the European giants – top Premier League clubs may have to work harder to fend off Barcelona, PSG, Real et al. While these situations are rare, clubs won’t be able to reinvest any monies accrued from a sale after the domestic window closes.

While the craziness could be just pushed back three weeks, the negative externality associated with unruly players trying to push through a move will likely end. Managers who crave stability could be the winners. By voting for the new rules clubs seem to be willing to sacrifice a star player who could be useful, albeit for 3-4 matches, for the sake of certainty and having no disruptive forces existing in the dressing room.

Recently, Sanchez, Costa, Coutinho and van Dijk were withdrawn from the first eleven as speculation mounted about their future. A good example prior to this year’s start was the case of Gylfi Sigurdsson. The Icelander wasn’t in the ‘right frame of mind’ to go on Swansea’s pre-season tour. He moved to Everton on the 16th of August. One of the most famous examples occurred in the 2008/2009. The atmosphere at Tottenham was close to toxic for the first few matches as the benched Dimitar Berbatov (successfully) forced through a move to Manchester United on deadline day. Tottenham scored 1 point out of 9 before the window closed. Juande Ramos was sacked soon after. The Berbatov transfer debacle did him no favours.

Moving things back will allow inevitable transfers to take place earlier and may negate any dressing room spillover effect associated with want-away stars. Also, increased squad certainty may improve parity between clubs. If negative effects caused by one individual spreads across a dressing room, another club may luckily play them in the first few weeks, prior to the windows close. Hopefully an early close will stop teams randomly benefiting from an unsettled opposition.  Finally, moving things back may do away with any perverse incentives stories (or conspiracy theories that surface online). For instance, Oxlade-Chamberlain represented Arsenal in Liverpool ‘s 4-0 win. A week later he joined the Merseyside club.

It will be interesting to see the effects of this change. Something in me thinks that without the buy in of other European leagues, the desired impact of the rule change may not be fully reached. If anything, big European leagues could see the Premier League's first move as giving them leverage in the transfer market. 

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.