The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Media
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Follow the Pundit!
  • Beat the Bookies
  • Upcoming Events
  • Education
  • Book Reviews
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Penalty Kicks, Game Theory and Childhood Memories

1/12/2014

 
By John Considine
Picture
I have a few memories of sitting in my father's car as we waited for my mother to return from shopping.  Occasionally he would take the opportunity to examine me on my "tables".  There would be two rounds to this exercise.  In the first round he would systematically quiz me as follows "3 multiplied by 1 is?", "3 multiplied by 2 is?" and so forth.  In the second round he would randomise the questions.  He could start with "3 multiplied by 7 is?"  Then it could be "3 multiplied by 2 is?"  And, he might reverse the order so that "3" was the second number, e.g. "9 multiplied by 3 is?"  I preferred the second round as it was more "competitive" - although he probably never saw it that way.

More often I would take the opportunity to pester him on sporting matters.  One September the conversation turned to penalty kicks.  In that year's All-Ireland football final, the Dublin goalkeeper (Paddy Cullen) saved a penalty from Liam Salmon (here).  He explained how it was more difficult to score a penalty in gaelic football than in soccer because of the smaller goal area and the greater distance between the penalty spot and the goal line.  In his efforts to explain how a penalty kick should be taken, he sketched out a set of goalposts in the condensation on the windows.  He explained how, if the kick had minimum level of force, there was some area that the goalkeeper could not cover.  A successful penalty was determined purely by the execution of the kick.  As I grew older I encountered this situation a few times.  When I took a penalty kick, I never saw it as a contest between myself and the goalkeeper.  

Now as an economist I use the penalty kick to help students towards an understanding about mixed strategies in game theory.  In doing so I have to somewhat park the lessons of my childhood.   In the classroom the goalkeeper has a role to play.  And, the goalkeeper had a role to play in one or two of the penalty kicks I struck.  I remember one particularly kick from a penalty shootout to decide a drawn cup game.  I kicked the ground just before the ball and the ball travelled towards the line inches to the left of the goalkeeper.  Fortunately, he had shifted his weight to cover a shot to his right and could not recover to stop the poorly taken penalty.  However, such experiences did not shake my conviction in the belief that the kicker was in charge of his/her own fate.

I wonder if there are students who do not believe the goalkeeper has a role and to what extent does such a conviction militate against their understanding of mixed strategies.  To help convince them, and myself, I rely heavily on the work of Ignacio Palacios-Huerta and the account of his work provided by Kuper and Szymanski in Soccernomics.  In his book, Beautiful Game Theory, Palacios-Huerta examines over 9,000 penalty kicks.  He begins by examining the mixed strategy predicted by game theory.  He then compare the predictions of the theory with the actual frequencies used by kicker and goalkeeper.  He finds no significant statistical difference between the frequencies predicted by theory and those used in practice.  It seems the soccer players can "do the math".




Comments are closed.

    Archives

    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was jointly founded in July 2013 by David Butler, Robbie Butler, John Considine and Declan Jordan. All four founders are Lecturers in Economics at University College Cork, Ireland.  

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis.

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.
✕