The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Incentives in the Vuelta a Espana

26/8/2015

 
By Paul O'Sullivan

The last of cycling’s 2015 Grand Tours, the Vuelta a Espana, began last Saturday with a 7.4km team time trial stage from Puerto Banus to Marbella. Grand Tours usually begin with a short prologue time trial, normally on an individual basis, in order to determine who wears the leader’s jersey for the first stage proper, but a rider’s time is also recorded for general classification (GC) purposes.

A significant development in Saturday’s team time trial was that after safety concerns were raised by some teams and riders (see account here by Team Sky’s Nicolas Roche), it was agreed that a rider’s recorded time would not contribute to his overall GC time. In effect, the time trial became a training spin. All that was left to be decided was the identity of the rider who would wear the race leader’s red jersey, which would be awarded to the rider that was first over the finish line for the fastest team. All team members are awarded the time of the fifth team member crossing the finish line.

The interesting aspect was how teams and individuals would react to this decision. As outlined after the stage by Nicolas Roche, teams with contenders for the overall GC title tended to be more cautious, while other teams may have been willing to take risks in order to achieve a rare stage win and generate some publicity for their team and sponsors. Team BMC, the world team time trial champions, won the stage in 8.10 at an average speed of 54.4km/h, though their main GC contender, Tejay van Garderen, was not one of its leading five members. In contrast, the teams with the main GC contenders were further behind, with Movistar (Valverde and Quintana) 24 seconds down in 9th and Team Sky (Froome) over a minute down in 20th place.

One can easily contrast these results to that of the 9th stage of this year’s Tour de France which was also a team time trial but over 28km, and where times did contribute to GC placing. BMC also won this, but with only one second to spare over Sky, and four seconds ahead of Movistar. Given this, it seems fairly clear that Sky and Movistar felt that any benefit from wining Saturday’s stage was not enough to compensate from any possible cost by possibly crashing. Indeed, as Nicolas Roche pointed out, “...we all agreed that it wasn’t worth taking the risk of riding full gas and somebody crashing out and possibly leaving Froomey short on help if he needed it later on in the race.”

For those of us that are regular cyclists, it is notable that while Sky took it easy, and even allowing for the closed circuit, they still managed an average speed of 48km/h.


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.