The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Media
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

French Top 14 rugby and Losing Bonus Points revisited

3/4/2017

 
By John Eakins

It’s over two and half years since I wrote the following article on the change in the losing bonus points rule in France’s Top 14 rugby competition. To re-cap quickly, since the beginning of the 2014/15 season, a losing team must be within 5 points rather than 7 in order to get a losing bonus point. The argument was that such a change would promote more positive play in the closing stages of games if teams had to do more to get a losing bonus point. For example if a team was 10 points behind in a game they would need only a penalty or drop goal in the old scenario, whereas now they need a try.

Given that close to three seasons has passed since its introduction it is opportune to examine the initial effects of the rule change. Figure 1 below plots the average losing bonus points per game in the Top 14 league as well as comparable data from the Pro 12 Celtic League and the English Premiership. As can be seen in the figure the average number of losing bonus points has actually fallen in France since the 2014/15 season while values in the other two leagues have remained relatively stable.

Picture
In some ways this is to be expected. What has effectively happened is that it is now harder to get a losing bonus point. But the question is whether the objective of the rule change has been met or not. If the average number of losing bonus points remained steady then in ‘real’ terms, teams are working harder. This therefore doesn’t appear to be the case. Then again these figures may not present the full picture. There may be many instances where teams looked for a bonus point with positive play but didn’t get it (although on the flip side, this was also presumably the case before the rule change).

Another point of relevance is whether the rule change has created an inequality between the top teams and the bottom teams. That is, the fact that teams have to work harder to get a losing bonus point may be a greater disadvantage to the teams at the bottom of the league. Figure 2 breaks down the Top 14 data in figure 1 into the top 7 and bottom 7 teams as per finishing position in each season. Prior to the rule change (using seasons 2007/08 to 2013/14) the top 7 teams won 0.37 losing bonus point on average while the bottom 7 teams won 0.46. After the rule change (using seasons 2014/15 to 2016/17) the figures were 0.30 and 0.32 respectively. So there is perhaps some evidence to suggest that rule change has had a disproportionate effect on lower ranked teams.
Picture

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.