The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Framing & Penalty Shootouts

17/9/2013

 
By David Butler

The conventional risky choice framing experiments, introduced by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in 1981, informed us that how options are framed affects our willingness to take risks. Even though participants were provided with logically consistent answers to the same problem, the majority of those given a positively framed version responded differently than those given a negatively framed one. The authors explained this finding through their 'prospect theory' and use it as an example of our propensity to be loss averse. The findings dealt a  blow to the axioms of the textbook model of consumer choice, confirming that how our options are presented affects our attitude toward risk. Since then a wide range of framing experiments have been conducted to measure the effects of everything from framing tax payments and financial returns, all the way to testing the importance of framing on beef and toaster sales!

This got me thinking about the penalty shootout in football, the incentives faced by footballers and the heartache it can create. John Terry's slip in Moscow and Nicolas Anelka’s miss, Gareth Southgate’s mishap in 96' and, of course for Irish fan’s, Daniel Timofte's 1990 penalty all come to mind as gut-wrenching moments for one individual but delight for others.

While we cannot overcome the problem (that there's always going to be some disappointment) as shootout is a zero-sum game where one team must win and another must lose, perhaps, with an adjustment to the task we can remove the burden of responsibility from one player to win or lose a shootout, taking an awful lot of anguish away.

The problem, as I can see it, is that at present the shootout is framed to create losers. The burden of expectation is placed on the player to score from 12 yards, something which is deemed a task every player should have the ability to perform. If however the task was altered so that it was difficult to achieve and framed so the burden of expectation was not on the player we could create winners.

I've had this conversation with my brother before and we've tried to think of innovative mechanisms to resolve a tie by framing the task so that 'winners' instead of 'losers' are created. Perhaps making players attempt to hit the crossbar from the half way line or beat the keeper from 25 yards out would ensure that instead of one player going home with the burden of responsibility, someone will have the delight that they achieved a very difficult task that was above the expectations placed on them.

Then again, maybe we cannot get rid of this burden of expectation and that changing the structure would merely shift this onus to the goalkeeper. Perhaps the pressure to perform is reciprocal and its really a matter of how we frame the competition and then distribute the expectations!  

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.