The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Floyd's Last Fight?

19/8/2015

 
By Gary Burns

The aftermath of Floyd Mayweather’s decision to have his ‘final’ fight against Andre Berto in September is one of bemusement and amusement. It has been greeted with a general underwhelming reception. Berto is a welterweight contender, no doubt, but his status cannot be seen beyond the remit of a contender. Following three losses in four bouts from 2011 to 2013, Berto’s early promise remained at just that.  Two of those losses were against opponents that came up short against Mayweather previously - Victor Ortiz and Robert Guererro.  Perhaps the most telling loss was against his most recent opponent, Jesus Soto Karass, who had eight losses at the time of the Berto fight.

With two rather ordinary victories to his name since that loss, Mayweather has plucked Berto from a select group. The frustration of the selection is the core issue boxing fans have with the sport. No centralised decision making body dictates match ups whereby the most deserving face each other. From a sporting perspective there are clear issues relating to competition design.

The manner in which Mayweather dispatched Manny Pacquiao in their May mega-fight would suggest Mayweather would have little issue with any of the journalists preferred opponents such as Amir Khan, Kell Brook, Keith Thurman or Danny Garcia (Mayweather would simply not go up in weight to fight Gennady Golovkin). So why Berto? The answer may simply be economic and by that, I do not mean the Berto bout.

Mayweather’s current six-fight deal with television network Showtime ends after the Berto fight. It’s open market for the television companies then to secure what will surely be Floyd’s real last fight, number 50.  Currently at 48 victories and 0 losses, an easy victory over Berto will pave the way for this event where Mayweather will get the chance to finish his career beating Rocky Marciano’s historic 49 fight 0 losses figures. The need for legacy should not be underestimated. This will be Floyd’s.

So why not a more deserving opponent for his 49th fight? Perhaps it is a reaction to the poor reviews of his Paquiao fight. The Berto fight will do a fraction of the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight (reportedly upwards of $500 million, the richest ever fight) but a 50th fight against a ‘better’ opponent will surely do big number PPV sales. Floyd will have vast bargaining power for this and will guarantee him a monster TV deal for one last fight. The appetite for another Mayweather dismantling is simply not there now. Fast forward and an impressive victory over Berto, and his next (and final 50th) fight will be sold as a historic event against Pacquiao again or a Khan or a Brook. Of course, Andre Berto may have his own place in history before that, however unlikely that may be.


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.