The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Dublin Gaelic Football: FundingĀ & Success

18/6/2018

 
By John Considine
Picture
This day last week there was an engaging radio discussion between Matt Cooper and Ewan MacKenna about the funding of gaelic games in Dublin.  The discussion took place on The Last Word (it is available on NewsTalk's Listen Back facility about 2 hours and 7 minutes into the podcast).  It is well worth a listen.  MacKenna provides some details on the funding and later in the discussion highlights some success enjoyed by the county.  The discussion reminded me of an article from a couple of years ago.

The article that came to mind was one proposing a rating system for gaelic football teams.  It appeared in the International Journal of Computer Science in Sport.  The primary purpose of the article was to advocate for a modified version of a system used to rate chess players.  The article also examined factors that influenced the success of teams.  The correlation between the rating values and financial figures threw up one very interesting result.

Dublin was the highest rated team at the end of 2015.  This rating was derived using 1,101 games between 2010 and 2015.  Dublin also received by far the largest amount of Games Development Income per registered player from the sport's governing body (the GAA).  According to the authors, Dublin received more than the other top 10 teams combined (MacKenna makes similar comparisons).  Dublin ranked first in both success and games development income.  These facts sit well with the conventional wisdom that Dublin's success is driven by the funding they received from the GAA.  There is a part of me that has sympathy with this view.

But the statistical results presented by S. Mangan and K. Collins bring this into question.  The correlation between "Games Development Income per registered player" and a team's rating was statistically significant and negative.  Negative.  The more GDI per registered player a team received from the governing body then the less their chances of success.

The authors of the article do not spend much time discussing the correlation.  This is probably a wise decision as there are potentially too many possibilities to be discussed and a limited amount of space to discuss them in.  What does the skewed distribution of funding imply for the correlations?  Are the results specific to the length of the time period and/or the specific time period selected?  Moreover, while many might expect a positive relationship between the two, the most important thing to remember is that "development" is not same as "success".  If nothing else then the article should make us pause for thought.

There is little doubt but that the debate will continue.


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.