The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Car Insurance And Television Subscriptions

24/2/2023

 
By Robbie Butler

Each March I need to renew my car insurance. This week my quote arrived in the post and unsurprisingly the 2023 charge was €40 higher than 2022. This despite making no claim – loyalty is punished. A quick search of the internet and I found a different insurer at almost €80 cheaper. So, for the 6th time in 18 years, I have changed my car insurer.

In the same period, I have changed my phone provider just once, my television provider once and have never changed my health insurance provider.

Greater competition in the car insurance market helps, but there is competition, or at least the illusion of competition, in health, phone, and television markets, even if it is not as deep.

The key difference for me is the contract default.

At the end of the 12-month period with my car insurance, if I do nothing, the relationship with the insurance provider simply ends. So, to break-up, silence is all that is required from me. This is why I am on my 6th provider.

With the other utilities, as the annual renewal date approaches, I may be contacted (as is the case with health insurance) but if I do nothing, the cover simply roles over to the next year. Breaking up requires action from me.

Television subscription is even worse. I recently had a conversation with my provider as I sought to reduce my bill and was met with the phrase “Oh yeah, you can. You are out of contract”. But despite this being the case, to end the “contract” I was “out of”, considerable effort was required.

The same companies, often engage in asymmetric starting and termination processes. For example, it was possible to upgrade my television sports package online with a simple click. Termination, despite being “out of contract” required a phone call of more than 20 minutes (part on hold/part talking) and conversations with two people, and an “explanation”. Such practices should end.

If customers can buy online, termination must be permitted in the same fashion e.g., the same click of a button.
​
If all utilities and subscriptions were forced to adopt the car insurance model – termination requires no action from the buyer – customers would generally be in a better place. People would switch providers more often, as the cost of changing would fall dramatically, and greater value for money would result.

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.