The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Burns & Beane: Bucks & Brains

10/5/2014

0 Comments

 
By John Considine
This post is the latest in our week-long look at some sports economics in The Simpsons.  The posts are to mark the publication by Stanford University Press of Homer Economicus: The Simpsons and Economics.

In this post I'm going to look at some of the sports economics issues raised in Homer at Bat.  Not surprisingly, this brilliant episode has been named as the best sports episode by Bleacher Report.  It revolves around the idea of buying success in sport.

In a striking similarity to Robert Redford in The Natural, Homer makes himself a bat and helps lead the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant softball team to an undefeated season.  In the championship game they face Shelbyville Power Plant owned by Aristotle Amadopoulous.  Monty Burns bets Amadopoulous $1m that Springfield will be successful in their contest.  In an effort to increase his chances of winning, Burns hires a collection of Major League Baseball players and gives them jobs in the power plant.  Due to bad luck, and some strange behaviour on the part of Monty Burns, all but one of the MLB ringers are unable to take their place in the game.  The one exception is Darryl Strawberry - the player taking Homer's position.  With the score tied and bases loaded with two outs in the bottom of the ninth inning, Burns replaces Strawberry with Simpson.  Burns proceeds to confuse Homer with his signals.  The confused Homer is hit on the head with the pitch bringing about the winning run.

At the moment, from a European perspective, it is hard to recall the episode and not think about the UEFA Financial Fair Play rules.  These rules arose, at least in part, to stop wealthy owners from investing large sums of money buying up players and potentially destablising the game.  This week the media was awash with speculation that Manchester City and Paris Saint Germain were facing server penalties for breaching the rules (here).  However, what I want to focus here is the issue of buying success or the cost of buying success.
Picture
The issue of buying success forms one of the best chapters in an excellent book by Rodney Fort and Jason Winfree.  The book is 15 Sports Myths and Why They're Wrong and, like Homer Economicus, it is published by the good people at Stanford University Press.  The relevant chapter is called 'Owners and General Managers are Inept'.  Fort & Winfree do a good job dispelling the myth captured by the chapter title (and seemingly personified by Mr Burns).  Along the way a few people come in for some mild/harsh criticism.  Sportswriter and broadcasters do not come out of the chapter that well.  According to the authors, sportswriters and broadcasters implicitly accept and sell the idea that there are constant costs to winning.  Fort & Winfree explain how the costs are non-linear and how they do not start at zero.

A similar analysis is presented in a superb piece in the latest The Economist. - it can be accessed through their blog on sport called Game Theory.  The graph below is reproduced from the article (although I have imposed the solid black production function that is available in some versions).  One could apply the following few lines from Fort & Winfree, "Depending on the sport, it is usually easy to win a few games.  However, wins get harder and harder to come by for good teams".

Picture
The Economist finds that money matters.  It also finds that the manager matters but not as much as money.  Fort & Winfree do not concede that Owners and General Managers matter.  In their efforts to prove that the decision makers are not inept, they leave the reader with the impression that Owners and General Managers do not matter much.  As an example, they say that Billy Beane would be hard pressed to better the record of Brian Cashman (Yankees).

It would be fair to say that Fort & Winfree are not overly impressed by Michael Lewis and Moneyball.  When discussing the cost of winning they say "We can't resist pointing out that the Oakland A's are also a bit below this more reasonable line (they were just above the earlier less reasonable solid line representation)."  I'm guessing there is little between Billy Beane and Monty Burns.

This brings us back to Darryl Strawberry.  Burns brought Strawberry to the power plant to replace Homer in the softball team.  This is the same Strawberry that features so prominently in Moneyball (the book rather than the movie).  The book explains how the New York Mets had the first draft pick in 1980.  They were considering Beane and Strawberry.  It seems the Mets head coach wanted Beane but they selected Strawberry with their first pick because of influence from Sports Illustrated.  They ended up getting both.  Strawberry was their first pick and Beane was their second pick.  It seems Sports Illustrated got it right - but for the wrong reason.  Just like Burns got it right in replacing Strawberry with Simpson.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.