The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

Behavioural Economics & Sports Data

29/3/2017

 
By David Butler

From time to time I get inquiries from students who are studying and researching concepts important to behavioural economics in the context of sport. This entry might be a help in getting started on the nexus.  The short list of five biases/fallacies and readings below is the largely created from email correspondences over the past few years. In time, hopefully I can flesh this out, creating a more detailed taxonomy and readings list for students. Part I below limits the concepts and readings to judgment and decision-making research.

It is important to note two points. The content below looks toward general behavioural concepts as the starting point and while some of the references here are old, they still represent important contributions. Secondly, the usual disclaimer applies -  the list definitely does not intend to provide an exhaustive account of all concepts studied or papers available.

Part I

Sport often offers a valuable domain to study the economics and psychology of decision making due to data accessibility (labour market data such as productivity and, at times, wage rates), methodological advantages (repeated but autonomous decision making occurs in well-defined environments) natural incentives (commonly monetary rewards are high) and the fact that sports stars have had an extensive opportunity to learn.

A good place to start considering a general connection between behavioural economics and sport in light of these advantages would be to consult the relatively recent paper by Pope and Schweitzer (2011) which asks Is Tiger Woods loss averse?

Pope, D. G., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2011). Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. The American Economic Review, 101(1), 129-157.

Following on from this, here are brief and simplified explanations accompanied by some readings for specific biases/fallacies where sports data is used to investigate decision-making.  

1. The Conjunction Fallacy

The conjunction rule states that if one conjunctive event is composed of two primary events, the probability of this single event occurring cannot be greater than probability of either one of the two primary events occurring independently. A breach of this rule was most notably observed in Kahneman and Tversky’s  ‘Linda problem’ where the authors contend that choices can be obscured by a representativeness heuristic – a cognitive mechanism used to make probability judgments under uncertainty.   

Erceg, N., & Galić, Z. (2014). Overconfidence bias and conjunction fallacy in predicting outcomes of football matches. Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 52-62.

Nilsson, H., & Andersson, P. (2010). Making the seemingly impossible appear possible: Effects of conjunction fallacies in evaluations of bets on football games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(2), 172-180.

2. The End-of-Day Effect

This bias occurs when individuals choose bets that have a lower probability of occurring but higher payoff in the later stages of a round of gambling. Prospect theory can accommodate this bias if gamblers form reference points in regards to their profit making - this reference profit is commonly zero. In the context of horse racing, If gamblers are incurring high loses by the last race of the day they can prefer to substitute away from gambling on favourites, choosing horses that have lower likelihood of wining in an effort to return to the reference point of zero

Ali, M. M. (1977). Probability and utility estimates for racetrack bettors. Journal of political Economy, 85(4), 803-815.

McGlothlin, W. H. (1956). Stability of choices among uncertain alternatives. The American Journal of Psychology, 604-615.

3. The Hot-Hand Fallacy

The hot-hand fallacy is a mistaken belief that if an individual successfully achieves an objective, this causes a greater chance of additional success in that activity for the short term future. The name for the term is derived from basketball, where fans and player alike often believe that their chances of success - scoring another basket - are higher following a previous score rather than a miss. It seems like a cottage industry has sprung up on this topic. A place to start is the review paper by Bar-Eli., Avugos, and Raab.

Bar-Eli, M., Avugos, S., & Raab, M. (2006). Twenty years of “hot hand” research: Review and critique. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(6), 525-553.

4. The Sunk Cost Fallacy

A sunk cost fallacy or escalation effect is committed when a decision-maker holds constant or increases their commitment to a particular choice, despite marginal costs exceeding marginal benefits. When more efficient alternative choices are available, decision makers maintain a choice that associated costs cannot be recovered. Simply put, people irrationally cry over spilt milk.

Borland, J., Lee, L., & Macdonald, R. D. (2011). Escalation effects and the player draft in the AFL. Labour Economics, 18(3), 371-380.

Camerer, C. F., & Weber, R. A. (1999). The econometrics and behavioral economics of escalation of commitment: a re-examination of Staw and Hoang’s NBA data. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39(1), 59-82.

Staw, B. M., & Hoang, H. (1995). Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly, 474-494.

5. The Winner’s Curse

The winner’s curse is the tendency for individuals to overbid in common value auctions when information is not complete. This idea was originally conceptualized in light of auctions for oil reserves in the Mexican Gulf. Winning bids in an auction environment can exceed the value of the asset purchased or can produce returns that are less than expected.

Burger, J. D., & Walters, S. J. (2008). The existence and persistence of a winner's curse: new evidence from the (baseball) field. Southern Economic Journal, 232-245.

Cassing, J., & Douglas, R. W. (1980). Implications of the auction mechanism in baseball's free agent draft. Southern Economic Journal, 110-121.

Kahn, L. M. (1993). Free agency, long-term contracts and compensation in Major League Baseball: Estimates from panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 157-164.

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.