The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

An Analysis of the Efficiency of Greyhound Racing Betting Markets

3/3/2022

 
By Bill Gaine

Bill is currently completing an MSc by Research at University College Cork.

Greyhound racing is an organised, competitive sport where six greyhounds run around an oval track to pursue a mechanical hare. Dogs wear jackets like jockey silks to help differentiate the dogs  in running. It is a sport of speed and at a full flight greyhound can run up to 43mph.

My research applies the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) to anecdotal evidence from greyhound racing. EMH states that asset prices reflect all available information (Downey, 2021). A direct implication is that it is impossible to "beat the market" consistently on a risk-adjusted basis since market prices should only react to new information (Fama, 1970).

A longstanding anecdotal belief in greyhound racing is that a dog placed in Trap Four (of the six possible traps) is the "coffin trap" (Martin, 2007). This is because greyhounds have different running styles:  some like to run on the inside, close to the rails, while others—known as wide runners—like to be on the outside, clear of the other dogs. 

The racing manager draws a railer in trap one, two or three and a wide runner in trap five or six. However, unless a dog in trap four is lucky or superior, it may find itself impossibly sandwiched between two thick chunks of greyhound and unable to run to its ability. This implies that being drawn in Trap 4 reduces the greyhound's chance of winning. The current study investigates if there is an empirical basis for this anecdotal belief.

Does a greyhound who draws Trap Four has less chance of success than if they were drawn in another trap?
 
A direct implication of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) is that it is impossible for any person gambling on races to "beat the market" consistently (Davies, 2016). If market prices are formed on a risk-adjusted basis, prices should only react to new information (Angelini, Angelis and Singleton, 2021). Therefore, if bookmakers priced betting markets fairly, all outcomes should total 100%. However, bookmakers factor an "overround" into their odds which is the practice of factoring profit-margin into odds; this is best displayed as a percentage (TimeForm, 2021). Typically, in U.K. greyhound racing, this is around 126% of the market price, so bookmakers factor 26% profit into each race.
 
Whether or not market prices factor in a race's "Trap 4" element is unexplored in academia. However, betting systems exist, and bettors in sister sport horse racing have attempted to try and beat the market by using data from sources like racing forms to "handicap" races (Hausch, Ziemba and Rubinstein, 1981). Technical systems require less information and only use current betting data bettors attempt to find inefficiencies in the "market" by betting on "overlays" with a positive expected value (Hausch, Ziemba and Rubinstein, 1981).
 
This research is timely as; betting markets have evolved rapidly in the past ten to fifteen years due to rapid improvements in technology. Thus, areas for academic inquiry are continually growing. Betfair's ability to "lay" along with "make" bets is one of the most fundamental changes in betting in recent years. Traditionally, punters only bet on positive outcomes, e.g., winning a race, whereas today, laying is possible. Laying refers to punters engaging in bets where they want a negative result, e.g., a loser.
 
Accessing data from more than 80,000 individual races in 2018, this study will incorporate greyhound racing into the growing academic discourse on betting markets, and empirically test EMH. A update of results will follow in early summer 2022.

References
Angelini, Giovanni & De Angelis, Luca & Singleton, Carl. (2022). Informational efficiency and behaviour within in-play prediction markets. International Journal of Forecasting. 38. 282-299. 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.05.012.

Davies, A., 2022. Traders' 'gut' feelings separate man from machine - study. [online] www.reuters.com. Available at: <https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-research-traders-idUKKCN11O0ZM> [Accessed 24 February 2022].

Downey, L., 2021. Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). [online] Investopedia. Available at: <https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/efficientmarkethypothesis.asp> [Accessed 24 February 2022].

Fama, E. F. 1970. 'Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work.' Journal of Finance 25, 383-417.

Hausch, Donald & Ziemba, William & Rubinstein, Mark. (1981). Efficiency of the Market for Racetrack Betting. Management Science. 27. 1435-1452. 10.1287/mnsc.27.12.1435.

Martin, J., 2007. No sense in the middle ground. [online] independent. Available at: <https://www.independent.ie/sport/horse-racing/no-sense-in-the-middle-ground-26272431.html> [Accessed 24 February 2022].

TimeForm, 2021. Overround Explained | What is Bookmaker Margin? | Timeform. [online] Timeform.com. Available at: <https://www.timeform.com/betting/advanced/overround-explained> [Accessed 17 December 2021].

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.