The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links
  • Data

An Alternative to the Rooney Rule

8/2/2022

 
By John Considine
Picture
When I think of the economics of racial preferences, I think of Thomas Schelling and his story about his coins and his checkerboard.  To aid his thoughts about the issue, Schelling covered the checkerboard with two types of coins on alternate squares.  The coins happily coexisted.  Or, in the words of economists, there was equilibrium.  Schelling then removed a small number of coins at random.  This “shock” to the system started a process that ended in segregated neighbourhoods.  The process was driven by the preferences of the coins.  Specifically, coins had a preference not to be “surrounded” by coins of an opposite type.  The coins were happy to live in a perfectly mixed neighbourhood but the disturbance to this happy equilibrium produced a dynamic that resulted in a new equilibrium – one of segregated neighbourhoods.
 
In discussing the implications for policy, Schelling argued that “getting ‘over the hump’ from one stable equilibrium to another requires either a large perturbation or concerted action”.  Quotas are one such concerted action.  The Rooney Rule specifies a quota of interview candidates for NFL Head Coaching positions.  Maybe the quotas need to be on the number of actual Head Coaches.
 
Schelling’s analysis started with a checkerboard model and specified preferences.  He traced the logical implication from micro motives to macro outcomes.  The wonders of economic theory and thought experiments.
 
Aggregating micro preferences into macro outcomes can be complicated.  The system of aggregation plays a big role.  Consider the situation where 100 commentators are asked to predict the outcome of the Super Bowl.  (Or collect the predictions from before the Bengals-Chiefs game.)  The sum of individual predictions could give a distorted picture.  If each of the 100 commentators believes that the Rams have a 55% chance of winning the Super Bowl then all 100 will pick the Rams.  Looking at the macro picture one would see a “certainty” with 100/100 votes for the Rams.
 
Could a similar aggregation method be producing the outcome we see at the level of NFL Head Coaches?  Each team gets to pick only one Head Coach at a time.
 
How might a quota work given the dynamics of NFL firing and hiring?  At one stage last month there were eight vacancies.  If we were in a happy equilibrium, like Schelling’s coins before the “shock”, then we could require similar replacements to those being replaced.  Allow the owners of the eight NFL teams get together and agree the hires between them.  If they could not agree then get them to select a panel of eight coaches from which their next hire would be determined by lottery.
 
Unfortunately, the current situation does not seem to be a happy one.  How might the transition to such a happy equilibrium happen?  Here we might use the thinking behind the “Save More Tomorrow” concept.  That idea arose where individuals said that they were not saving enough but that they could not make savings at the moment.  These individuals signed up to a commitment to save a greater proportion of any income increase that they would receive in the future.  Back to our eight vacant NFL positions.  In the transition period, a greater proportion of these could be designated for minority candidates.  Again, the NFL owners could sort it out between themselves in the shadow of the lottery system.
 
Schelling used coins on a game board to educate us on how individual decisions can lead to less desirable collective outcomes.  He noted that our preferences could be driven by conscious or unconscious desires.  Our school football coach also used coins to educate his players.    He would put coins on a green cloth.  The green surface had the markings of a GAA field on one side.  The coach had made these markings.  On the other side were the original markings of a soccer field.  He used the coins to illustrate the decisions we should be making in given scenarios.  His words were all reason and rationalization.  However, he used the coins to feed our unconscious biases.  We were always the bigger, more valuable, silver coins.  Sometimes the unconscious can have a bigger impact unless explicitly guarded against.  Therefore, a conscious commitment by the NFL to a quota for hires rather than interviews might be a good idea.


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Related

The website is not formally affiliated to any institution and all of the entries represent the personal views and opinions of an individual contributor. The website operates on a not-for-profit basis. For this reason we decline all advertisement opportunities. 

Contact

To contact us email sportseconomics2013@gmail.com or find us on Twitter @SportEcon.