The Economics of Sport
  • Sports Economics
  • About
  • Workshop
  • Selected Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • A Primer on Gaelic Games
  • Upcoming Events
  • Media
  • Education
  • Resources & Links

Could Dublin be a victim of its GAA success?

1/11/2014

 
By Paul O'Sullivan
Picture
In a previous post, following the publication early this year of the annual report of the GAA Central Council, I discussed a proposal from that report whereby ‘weaker’ counties would receive a greater proportion of central GAA revenue in order to make them more competitive. More recent newspaper reports have outlined how such a scheme might operate following a review of central funding by the GAA’s National Financial Management Committee.

The perceived ‘problem’ at present is that Dublin’s ability to sign major sponsorship deals, combined with their games development funding and population size gives them an unfair advantage relative to other counties. This could also be applied to other ‘strong’ counties in both codes. This concern has probably been magnified by a belief that Dublin could dominate Gaelic Football for the foreseeable future. As a result of this, it is proposed to cut Dublin’s games development funding by some, as yet undetermined, amount and increase that given to ‘weaker’ counties.

This Irish Independent article by Martin Breheny outlined the allocation of games development funding across the country. Dublin gets by far the most with just over €1.5m, Cork are second with €0.22m, while Leitrim gets the least with just over €0.1m. This is not surprising given the populations of the counties. Simply controlling for population differences, with population figures taken from the 2011 Census, then on a per-capita basis, Dublin receives €1.18, Cork gets €0.47, while Leitrim gets €3.25. By this measure, Longford does best of all with per-capita funding of €3.73. This is a very crude measure and undoubtedly does not tell the full story about the efficacy or ‘fairness’ of how monies are distributed.

According to the above article, the NFMC argues that “In the interests of equalisation and of achieving a better funding distribution balance, it is proposed to reduce the funding allocation to Dublin over time”. The article also outlines some of the criteria that may be used to classify a country a ‘small’ or ‘weak’, like a population of less than 100,000 and having fewer than 35 clubs. On the other hand, the article states that extra grants will not be made to counties with ‘solid financial reserves’ or those playing in Divisions 1 and 2 of the National League. Is there a possibility that counties will have an incentive to forego promotion, or not avoid relegation, in order to receive more money?

For a National League game, the ‘home’ county can retain 20% of gate money directly to cover costs. Of the vast majority of the remainder, 20% is contributed to a national ‘pool’ that is relatively equally split between all counties and the other 80% is divided among the participating teams. Under this set-up, ‘stronger’ counties, with greater attendances, are subsidising the ‘weaker’ ones to some extent. In Martin Breheny’s article, he says that counties have been arguing for being allowed to retain a greater percentage of gate money. Given the pool system, it is possible that weaker counties would be better off the more gate revenue that must be contributed to any pool.

In possibly amending their re-distribution schemes, one must ask what the objective of GAA is. If it is to put counties on a more equal financial footing, then to what end? As Eugene McGee argues in this article, “the biggest problem facing football in particular is that over 20 counties have little or no chance of winning the All-Ireland, and many have no chance of winning a provincial title either”. This point can be equally applied to hurling. As I argued in my previous post, however, given that the talent available to a county is geographically restricted, and there is effectively no transfer market, extra funding to weaker counties is unlikely to make much of a difference to their likelihood of winning a national or provincial title.


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    About

    This website was founded in July 2013.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    American Football
    Athletics
    Baseball
    Basketball
    Behavioural Economics
    Boxing
    Broadcasting
    Competitive Balance
    Cricket
    Cycling
    Darts
    David Butler
    Declan Jordan
    Drugs
    Ed Valentine
    Epl
    Esports
    Expenditure
    F1
    Fifa World Cup
    Finances
    Funding
    Gaa
    Gaelic Games
    Gambling
    Game Theory
    Gary Burns
    Geography
    Golf
    Greyhound Racing
    Guest Posts
    Horse Racing
    Impact Studies
    John Considine
    John Eakins
    League Of Ireland
    Location
    Media
    Mls
    Mma
    Olympics
    Participation
    Paul O'Sullivan
    Premier League
    Regulation
    Research
    Robbie Butler
    Rugby
    Simpsonomics
    Snooker
    Soccer
    Spatial Analysis
    Sporting Bodies
    Stephen Brosnan
    Swimming
    Taxation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tennis
    Transfers
    Uefa
    Ufc
    World Cup
    Wwe

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.